"Yes or No? What do Lithuanian Unemployed Young People Think about Employment in Elderly Care Sector?"
Keywords:
unemployed youth, opinion, elderly care sector, workplace, profilingAbstract
The aim of the research is to investigate unemployed young people’s opinions about work and the workplace in the elderly care sector in Lithuania. The key theoretical concepts of the study are public service motivation (PSM), work meaningfulness and gendered approaches. Quantitative research methodology was chosen to gather the empirical data. The respondents of the survey, which was carried out in 2022, were young unemployed people (aged 18–29) registered in the Lithuanian Employment Service database. The rationale for this analysis is growing demand for labour force in the elderly care services, and fairly significant proportion of NEET youth in Lithuania and other EU countries. Various initiatives globally and particularly in the countries of Europe reveal that if to find ways how to attract this underutilised workforce to the elderly care sector, this could be one of the employment alternatives for young unemployed people. Therefore, the attitudes of the young unemployed people towards workplace in elderly care can be utilised searching how to improve effectiveness of employment services. Our study revealed that young unemployed people in Lithuania agree that work in elderly care sector is valuable and meaningful work to the society, however they see work in elderly care as physically and emotionally demanding, unqualified and low-paid. If youth would have to work temporarily in elderly care, they would prefer working for more independent elderly people.
Downloads
References
Assmann, Marie‐Luise, Ida Tolgensbakk, Janikke S. Vedeler, and Kjetil K. Bøhler. 2021. “Public employment services: Building social resilience in youth?.” Social Policy & Administration 55 (4): 659-673. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12649.
Berger, Mark C., Dan Black, and Jeffrey A. Smith. 2001. Evaluating profiling as a means of allocating government services. Physica-Verlag HD.
Bergman, Elizabeth J., Mary Ann Erickson, and Jocelyn N. Simons. 2014. “Attracting and training tomorrow's gerontologists: What drives student interest in aging?.” Educational Gerontology 40 (3): 172-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2013.802184.
Black, Dan A. 2003. Profiling UI claimants to allocate reemployment services: evidence and recommendations for States. US Department of Labor, Employment and Training Administration.
Blažienė, Inga, and Laimutė Žalimienė. 2020. “Between user’s expectations and provider’s quality of work: The future of elderly care in Lithuania.” Journal of Population Ageing 13 (1): 5-23.
Bozeman, Barry, and Xuhong Su. 2015. “Public service motivation concepts and theory: A critique.” Public Administration Review 75 (5): 700-710. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12248.
Bright, Leonard. 2021. “Does Person Organization Fit and Person-Job Fit Mediate the Relationship between Public Service Motivation and Work Stress among US Federal Employees?”. Administrative Sciences 11 (2): 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci11020037.
Christensen, Robert K., and Bradley E. Wright. 2011. “The effects of public service motivation on job choice decisions: Disentangling the contributions of person-organization fit and person-job fit.” Journal of public administration research and theory 21 (4): 723-743. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq085.
Connell, Julia, Alan Nankervis, and John Burgess. 2015. “The challenges of an ageing workforce: an introduction to the workforce management issues.” Labour & Industry: a journal of the social and economic relations of work 25 (4): 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2015.1083364.
Cummings, Sherry M., Geri Adler, and Vaughn A. DeCoster. 2005. “Factors influencing graduate-social-work students' interest in working with elders.” Educational Gerontology 31 (8): 643-655. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270591003382.
Desiere, Sam, Kristine Langenbucher, and Ludo Struyven. 2018. Profiling tools for early identification of jobseekers who need extra support. Policy Brief on Activation Policies.
Eberts, Randall W., and Christopher J. O'Leary. 1996. “Profiling Unemployment Insurance Beneficiaries.” Employment Research Newsletter 3 (2): 1.
Emmanouil, Effie, Georgios Chatzichristos, Andrew Herod, and Stelios Gialis. 2023. “In what way a ‘Guarantee for youth’? NEETs entrapped by labour market policies in the European Union.” Journal of Youth Studies: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2023.2211943.
Eurofound. 2020. Long-term care workforce: Employment and working conditions. Eurofound. Available at: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef20028en.pdf.
European Institute for Gender Equality. 2020. Gender Equality Index 2020 — Digitalisation and the future of work. Available at: https://eige.europa.eu/publications/gender-equality-index-2020-report.
Eurostat. 2024. Young people neither in employment nor in education and training by sex, age and labour status (NEET rates) [yth_empl_150].
Eurostat. 2021. Database by themes. Population and social conditions. Labour market (labour). Employment and unemployment (Labour force survey) (employ). LFS series - detailed annual survey results (lfsa). Employment – LFS series (lfsa_emp). Employment by sex, age and economic activity (from 2008 onwards, NACE Rev. 2) - 1 000 [lfsa_egan2].
Firth-Cozens, Jenny, and Jocelyn Cornwell. 2009. “Enabling compassionate care in acute hospital settings.” London: The King’s Fund.
Gallagher, Ann, Aoife Lane, Caroline Egan, Katsumasa Ota, Keiko Aoishi, Natsuki Nakayama, Nataliya Kasimovskaya et al. 2022. “Views of Generation Z regarding care and care careers: a four-country study.” International Journal of Care and Caring 6 (3): 355-377. https://doi.org/10.1332/239788221X16308608299691.
Global Health Workforce Network. 2020. Youth and decent work in the health and social care sector. Youth Hub, Global Health Workforce Network, World Health Organization. Available at: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/health-workforce/youthpaper-final-feb2020.pdf?sfvrsn=a0a4431c_2.
Grant, Adam M. 2008. “Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity.” Journal of applied psychology 93 (1): 48. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48.
Haikkola, Lotta. 2021. “Classed and gendered transitions in youth activation: the case of Finnish youth employment services.” Journal of Youth Studies 24 (2): 250-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2020.1715358.
Hasluck, Chris. 2008. “The use of statistical profiling for targeting employment services: The international experience.” New European approaches to long-term unemployment: What role for public employment services and what market for private stakeholders: 39-56.
Houston, David J. 2000. “Public-service motivation: A multivariate test.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 (4): 713–728. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024288.
Hu, J., and Jacob B. Hirsh. 2017. “Accepting lower salaries for meaningful work.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 1649. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01649.
Hussein, Shereen, Mohamed Ismail, and Jill Manthorpe. 2016. “Male workers in the female-dominated long-term care sector: evidence from England.” Journal of Gender Studies 25 (1): 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2014.887001.
ILO, and OECD. 2019. New job opportunities in an ageing society. Paper prepared for the 1st Meeting of the G20 Employment Working Group.
ILO. 2018. Care work and care jobs for the future of decent work. International Labour Office. Geneva: ILO.
Irwin, Sarah. 2021. “Young people in the middle: pathways, prospects, policies and a new agenda for youth research”. Journal of Youth Studies 24 (8): 1033–1051. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2020.1792864.
Job Seeker classification instrument (JSCI). 1998. Common wealth Department of Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business, CANBERRA ACT 2601.
Kim, Sangmook. 2016. “Job characteristics, public service motivation, and work performance in Korea.” Gestion et Management Public 5 (3): 7–24. https://doi.org/10.3917/gmp.051.0007.
Kocak, Orhan, Serdar Aydin, Nurefsan Tomac, and Mustafa Z. Younis. 2020. “College students' attitudes toward the elderly: an exploratory study in Turkey.” Ageing International. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-020-09393-8.
Le Bihan, Blanche, Trudie Knijn, and Claude Martin. (Eds.). 2013. Work and care under pressure. Care Arrangement Across Europe. Amsterdam University Press.
Lindberg, Birgitta, Carina Nilsson, Daniel Zotterman, Siv Söderberg, and Lisa Skär. 2013. “Using information and communication technology in home care for communication between patients, family members, and healthcare professionals: a systematic review.” International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications 1: 461829. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/461829.
Maybud, Susan. 2015. Women and the future of work – taking care of the caregivers. ILO‘s World Employment and Social Outlook.
Maslauskaitė, Aušra. 2004. “Lytis, globa ir kultūriniai gerovės kapitalizmo barjerai Lietuvoje.“ [“Gender, Care and Opportunities of Welfare Capitalism in Lithuania”]. Sociologija. Mintis ir veiksmas 2004/3: 39–51. https://doi.org/10.15388/SocMintVei.2004.3.5973.
Mažeikienė, Natalija, and Agnė Dorelaitienė. 2011. “Socialinių darbuotojų vyrų nehegemoninio vyriškumo patirtys iš feministinės biografinio tyrimo perspektyvos.” [Male social workers’ non-hegemonic experiences from the feminist biographical research perspective] Kultūra ir visuomenė: socialinių tyrimų žurnalas= Culture and Society: Journal of Social Eesearch 2 (2): 55–74.
Montgomery, Tom, Micaela Mazzei, Simone Baglioni, and Stephen Sinclair. 2017. “Who cares? The social care sector and the future of youth employment.” Policy & Politics 45 (3): 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557316X14778312165186.
Moore, Sarah, Leon Grunberg, and Alan J. Krause. 2015. “Generational differences in workplace expectations: A comparison of production and professional workers.” Current Psychology 34(2): 346–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9261-2.
Nolan, M. R., J. Brown, S. Davies, J. Keady, and J. Nolan. 2002. Longitudinal study of the effectiveness of educational preparation to meet the needs of older people and their carers: The Advancing Gerontological Education in Nursing. English National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting, London.
Llena‐Nozal, Ana, Eileen Rocard, and Paola Sillitti. 2022. “Providing long-term care: Options for a better workforce”. International Social Security Review 75: 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12310.
OECD. 2020. Who cares? Attracting and retaining care workers for the elderly. OECD Health Policy Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD. 2023. Health at a Glance 2023: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/7a7afb35-en.
Official Statistics Portal. 2024. Available at: https://osp.stat.gov.lt/statistiniu-rodikliu-analize#/.
Okunevičiūtė Neverauskienė, Laima, Žalimienė, Laimutė, and Jolita Junevičienė. 2021. “Youth preferences for workplace characteristics and what could elderly care sector suggest in this case.” Filosofija. Sociologija 32 (2): 95–102. https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.v32i2.4411.
Orfao, Guillermo, Alberto del Rey, and Miguel Á. Malo. 2023. “Multiple jobholding and non-standard employment among young workers: a comparative analysis of EU-28 member states.” Journal of Youth Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2023.2187283.
Pearson, Olivia. 2022. “Transforming youth participation? Examining co-production in a school based time bank”. Journal of Youth Studies 25 (1): 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2020.1849582.
Pease, Bob. 2011. “Men in social work: challenging or reproducing an unequal gender regime?” Affilia 26 (4): 406–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109911428207.
Perry, James L., and Annie Hondeghem. 2008. “Building theory and empirical evidence about public service motivation.” International Public Management Journal 11 (1): 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967490801887673.
Pratt Michael G., and Blake E. Ashforth. 2003. “Fostering meaningfulness in working and at work”. In Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline, edited by K.S. Cameron, J.E. Dutton and R.E. Quinn, Chapter 20, 309–327. San Francisco.
Mathew Puthenparambil, Jiby, and Teppo Kröger. 2016. “Using private social care services in Finland: free or forced choices for older people?” Journal of Social Service Research 42 (2): 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2015.1137534.
Ritz, Adrian, Carina Schott, Christian Nitzl, and Kerstin Alfes. 2020. “Public service motivation and prosocial motivation: two sides of the same coin?” Public Management Review 22 (7): 974–998. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1740305.
Rosimere Ferreira Santana, Márcia Teixeira de Souza, Fátima Helena do Espírito Santo, Edmundo Drummond Silva and Nathália Henrique Martins2015. “Youth participation in home care for the elderly.” Journal of Gerontology and Geriatric Research S 3: 006. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167-7182.S3-006.
Steger, Michael F., Bryan J. Dik, and Ryan D. Duffy. 2012. “Measuring meaningful work: The work and meaning inventory (WAMI).” Journal of career Assessment 20 (3): 322-337. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072711436160.
State Data Agency. 2024. Official Statistics Portal. Indicators Database. Population and social statistics. Social protection. Survey of Social services. Care institutions. Care institutions for adults. Number of care institutions for the elderly at the end of year. Available at: https://osp.stat.gov.lt/en_GB/statistiniu-rodikliu-analize#/
Sutcliffe, Jacinta Ellen, and Subas P. Dhakal .2018. “Youth unemployment amidst aged care workers shortages in Australia: why care about the millennials.” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion 37: 2: 182–198. https://doi.org/10.1108/EDI-05-2017-0105.
The 2021 Ageing Report: Economic and Budgetary Projections for the EU Member States (2019-2070). The 2021 Ageing Report: cross country tables. 2021. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/2021-ageing-report-economic-and-budgetary-projections-eu-member-states-2019-2070_en.
The Council of the European Union. 2010. Council Decision of 21 October 2010 on guidelines for the employment policies of the Member States (2010/707/EU). Available at: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:32010D0707.
Thouin, Éliane, Véronique Dupéré, and Anne-Sophie Denault. 2023. “Paid employment in adolescence and rapid integration into a career-related job in early adulthood among vulnerable youth: The identity connection.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 142: 103864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103864.
van der Voet, Joris, and Bram Steijn. 2021. “Relational job characteristics and prosocial motivation: A longitudinal study of youth care professionals.” Review of Public Personnel Administration 41 (1): 57–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X19862852.
Vandenabeele, Wouter. 2007. “Toward a public administration theory of public service motivation: An institutional approach.” Public Management Review 9 (4): 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030701726697.
Vandenabeele, Wouter. 2008. “Government calling: Public service motivation as an element in selecting government as an employer of choice.” Public Administration 86: 1089–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00728.x.
Vazquez-Rodriguez, Ana, Garcia-Alvarez, Jesus., and Rego, Miguel Ángel Santos, Alexandre Sotelino Losada, and Mar Lorenzo Moledo. 2023. “What to do in front of the risk of a "lost generation"? Youth and employment in an era of uncertainty.” Estudios Sobre Education 44: 81–108. https://doi.org/10.15581/004.44.004.
Wright, Bradley E., and Robert K. Christensen. 2010. “Public service motivation: A test of the job attraction selection-attrition model.” International Public Management Journal 13: 155–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967491003752012.
Wright, Bradley E., and Sanjay K. Pandey. 2008. “Public service motivation and the assumption of person—Organization fit: Testing the mediating effect of value congruence.” Administration & Society 40 (5): 502–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399708320187.
Žalimienė, Laimutė, Blažienė, Inga, and Jolita Junevičienė. 2020. “What type of familialism is relevant for Lithuania? The case of elderly care.” Journal of Baltic Studies 51 (2): 159–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2020.1746368.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Romanian Academy Publishing House
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
