Research Note: Job Satisfaction and Working From Home in Romania, Before and During COVID-19



work from home, job satisfaction, WLB, pandemic, teleworkers


Based on ICTs development, telework is a rapidly changing phenomenon (Eurofound, 2017) and has provoked many debates on how it influences people's lives (Allen, Golden and Shockley, 2015; Golden, 2009), allowing people to work from anywhere and anytime via laptops, tablets, and smartphones (Maitland and Thomson, 2014). The Covid-19 outbreak accelerated social change and led to a forced entry of entire segments of the workforce into telework. The change was steep in particular for countries with a lower pre-pandemic incidence of working from home, such as Romania. Using longitudinal data from an original series of surveys (Voicu et al. 2020) carried out in 2018 and during the Spring 2020 lockdown in Romania, the paper aims to explore the job satisfaction of those working-from-home in relation to work-life boundaries, before and during the quarantine period. Findings are useful for a deeper understanding of how new work arrangements influence tele-workers' perceptions of their quality of life. Results indicate that while before the pandemic, the job satisfaction of those working from home was increasing with the age of the respondent (the younger being more satisfied with working from home), that trend changed during quarantine, and job satisfaction increased significantly for people over 40. Additionally, working more hours before the pandemic is associated with lower job satisfaction scores during COVID-19 quarantine.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Dana Ioana Țălnar-Naghi, Research Institute for the Quality of Life, Romanian Academy

Address: 13 September Road no. 13, District 5, 050711, Bucharest, Romania.


Aguilera, A., Lethiais, V., Rallet, A., and Proulhac, L. 2016. “Home-based telework in France: Characteristics, barriers, and perspectives”. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 92:1–11.

Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., and Shockley, K. M. 2015. How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 16:40–68.

Bentley, K., and Yoong, P. 2000. “Knowledge work and telework: An exploratory study”. Internet Research 10: 346–356.

Brief, A. P., and Weiss, H. M. 2002. “Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace”. Annual Review of Psychology,53, 279–307.

Caillier, J. G. 2012. “The impact of teleworking on work motivation in a U.S. federal government agency”. American Review of Public Administration 42: 461–480.

Charalampous, M., Grant, C. A., Tramontano, C., and Michailidis, E. 2019. “Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ wellbeing at work: a multidimensional approach”. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1):51–73.

Chesley, N. 2010. “Technology use and employee assessments of work effectiveness, workload, and pace of life”. Information, Communication & Society 13: 485–514.

Chesley, N. 2014. “Information and communication technology use, work intensification and employee strain and distress”. Work, Employment and Society 28:589–610.

Crosbie, T., and Moore, J. 2004. “Work–life Balance and Working from Home”. Social Policy & Society 3(3): 223–233 DOI:10.1017/S1474746404001733

De Menezes, L. M., and Kelliher, C. 2011. “Flexible working and performance: A systematic review of the evidence for a business case”. International Journal of Management Reviews 13: 452–474.

Diener, E., Oishi, S., and Lucas, R. E. 2003. “Personality, culture, and subjective wellbeing: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life”. Annual Review of Psychology 54: 403–425.

Eddleston, K. A., and Mulki, J. 2015. “Toward Understanding Remote Workers’ Management of Work–Family Boundaries: The Complexity of Workplace Embeddedness”. Group and Organization Management 42(3): 346–387.

European Quality Life Survey. 2016. accessed on January 19:

Eurofound and the International Labour Office. 2017. “Working anytime, anywhere: The effects on the world of work”. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, and the International Labour Office, Geneva. Retrieved from Eurofound Publications website

Eurofound. 2020. “Living, working and COVID-19, COVID-19 series”, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. Retrieved on

Fana, M., Tolan, S., Torrejón, S., Urzi Brancati, C., Fernández-Macías, E. 2020. “The COVID confinement measures and EU labour markets”, EUR 30190 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg; doi:10.2760/079230, JRC120578, retrieved on

Frazis, Harley and J. Stewart. 2014. “Is the workweek really overestimated.” Monthly Labor Review 137: 1-15.

Feng, Z., and Savani, K. 2020. “Covid-19 created a gender gap in perceived work productivity and job satisfaction: implications for dual-career parents working from home”. Gender in Management, 35(7/8):719-736.

Felstead A., Jewson N., Phizacklea A., and Walters S. 2002.” Opportunities to work at home in the context of work‒life balance”. Human Resource Management Journal 12: 54-76.

Gajendran, R. S., and Harrison, D. A. 2007. “The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences”. Journal of Applied Psychology 92:1524–1541.

Gambles, R., Lewis, S. and Rapoport, R. 2006. “The Myth of WLB: The Challenge of Our Time for Men, Women and Societies”. Chichester: Wiley.

Greenhaus, J.H., Collins, K.M. and Shaw, J.D. 2003. “The Relation between Work ‒ Family Balance and Quality of Life”. Journal of Vocational Behavior 63:510-531.

Golden, T.D. 2009. “Applying Technology to Work: Toward a Better Understanding of Telework”. Organization Management Journal6 4: 241–250.

Golden, T. D., and Veiga, J. F. 2005. “The impact of extent of telecommuting on job satisfaction: Resolving inconsistent findings”. Journal of Management 31: 301–318.

Jacobs, J. 1998. “Measuring time at work: are self-reports accurate?” Monthly Labor Review 121: 42-53.Judge, T. A., Ilies, R. 2004. “Affect and job satisfaction: A study of their relationship at work and at home”. Journal of Applied Psychology 89: 661–673.

Hartig, T., Kylin, C., and Johansson, G. 2007. “The telework tradeoff: Stress mitigation versus constrained restoration”. Applied Psychology: An International Review 56: 232–253.

Hilbrecht, M., Shaw, S. M., Johnson, L. C., and Andrey, J. 2008. “I’m Home for the Kids”: Contradictory Implications for Work-Life Balance of Teleworking Mothers. Gender, Work and Organization 15( 5): 454-476.

Hilbrecht, M., Shaw, S. M., Johnson, L. C., and Andrey, J. 2013. “Remixing work, family, and leisure: teleworkers’ experiences of everyday life”. New Technology, Work and Employment 28(2): 130-144

Hislop, D. and C. Axtell 2007. “The neglect of spatial mobility in contemporary studies of work: the case of telework”. New Technology, Work and Employment 22(1): 34–51.

Hislop, D. and C. Axtell. 2009. “To Infinity and Beyond? Workspace and the Multi-location Worker”. New Technology, Work and Employment 24(1): 60–75.

Hornung, S., and Glaser, J. 2009. “Home-based telecommuting and quality of life: Further evidence on an employee-oriented human resource practice”. Psychological Reports 104: 395–402.

Hynes, M. 2014a. “Telework Isn’t Working: A Policy Review. In the Economic and Social Review 45(4): 223–233.

van der Lippe, T., Lippényi, Z. 2020. Beyond Formal Access: Organizational Context, Working from Home, and Work–Family Conflict of Men and Women in European Workplaces. Social Indicators Research 151: 383–402.

Kelliher, C., and Anderson, D. 2010. “Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work”. Human Relations 63: 83–106.

Kurowska, A. 2018. “Gendered Effects of Home-Based Work on Parents’ Capability to Balance Work with Non-work: Two Countries with Different Models of Division of Labour Compared”. Social Indicators Research 151(2): 405-425. doi:10.1007/s11205-018-2034-9.

Maitland, A., and Thomson, P. 2014. “Future work (expanded and updated): Changing organizational culture for the new world of work”. London, UK: Springer.

Marsh, K., and Musson, G. 2008. “Men at work and at home: Managing emotion in telework”. Gender, Work, and Organization 15: 31–48.

Maruyama, T., Hopkinson, P. G., and James, P. 2009. “A multivariate analysis of work–life balance outcomes from a large-scale telework programme”. New Technology, Work and Employment 24: 76–88.

Moe, K., and Shandy, D. 2010. “Glass ceilings & 100-hour couples: What the opt-out phenomenon can teach us about work and family”. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press.

Morganson, V. J., Major, D. A., Oborn, K. L., Verive, J. M., and Heelan, M. P. 2010. “Comparing telework locations and traditional work arrangements: Differences in work‒life balance support, job satisfaction, and inclusion”. Journal of Managerial Psychology 25: 578–595.

Parasuraman, S., and Greenhaus, J. H. 2002. “Toward reducing some critical gaps in work–Family research”. Human Resource Management Review 12: 299–312.

Powell, A., and Craig, L. 2015. “Gender differences in working at home and time use patterns: evidence from Australia”. Work, Employment and Society 29(4): 571–589.

Russell, H., O’Connell, P. J., and McGinnity, F. 2009. “The impact of flexible working arrangements on work–life conflict and work pressure in Ireland”. Gender, Work and Organization 16: 73–97.

Shamir, B. and Salomon, I. 1985. “Work-at-Home, and the Quality of Working Life”. The Academy of Management Review 10(3): 455—464.

Saltmarsh, S. and Randell-Moon, H., 2015. “Managing the risky humanity of academic workers: risk and reciprocity in university work‒life balance policies”. Policy Futures in Education, 13 (5): 662–682 doi:10.1177/1478210315579552.

Sardeshmukh, S. R., Sharma, D., and Golden, T. D. 2012. “Impact of telework on exhaustion and job engagement: A job demands and job resources model”. New Technology, Work and Employment 27: 193–207.

Sullivan, C., and Lewis, S. 2001. “Home-based telework, gender and the synchronization of work and family: Perspectives of teleworkers and their co-residents”. Gender, Work and Organization 8(2): 123–145.

Ter Hoeven, C. L., and Van Zoonen, W. 2015. “Flexible work designs and employee wellbeing: Examining the effects of resources and demands”. New Technology, Work and Employment 30: 237–255.

Tietze, S., and Nadin, S. 2011. “The psychological contract and the transition from office-based to home-based work”. Human Resource Management Journal 21: 318–334.

Tietze, S., and Musson, G. 2005. “Recasting the home-work relationship: A case of mutual adjustment?” Organization Studies 26:1331–1352.

Van Horn, J. E., Taris, T. W., Schaufeli, W. B., and Schreurs, P. J. 2004. “The structure of occupational wellbeing: A study among Dutch teachers”. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 77: 365–375.

Vega, R. P., Anderson, A. Jveg., and Kaplan, S. A. 2015. “A within-person examination of the effects of telework”. Journal of Business and Psychology 30: 313–323.

Virick, M., DaSilva, N., and Arrington, K. 2010. “Moderators of the curvilinear relation between extent of telecommuting and job and life satisfaction: The role of performance outcome orientation and worker type”. Human Relations 63: 137–154.

Voicu, B. 2015. “Priming Effects in Measuring Life Satisfaction”, Social Indicators Research. 124(3):993-1013.

Voicu, B., Neguț, A., Tufă, L., Glăvan, E., Florea, A., and Țălnar-Naghi, D. 2020. “Working from home 2.1 Cum s-a lucrat de acasă în carantină”, Report accessed on January 19:

Wight, V. R., and Raley, S. B. 2009. “When home becomes work: work and family time among workers at home”. Social Indicators Research 93(1): 197–202.



How to Cite

Țălnar-Naghi, D. I. (2021). Research Note: Job Satisfaction and Working From Home in Romania, Before and During COVID-19. Calitatea Vieții, 32(2), 1–22. Retrieved from